Posted by: Lister | November 30, 2007

Hanna Diskin

Via Muzzlewatch, which has the tag-line “Tracking efforts to stifle open debate about US-Israeli foreign policy.” This time they have a story about a university lecturer who has resigned because of complaints from students (some of them Jewish) that she was too biased towards Israel. The story is in The Washington Jewish Week:

Hanna Diskin told the students in her “Arab-Israeli Conflict” class on Tuesday of last week that she would not be teaching the class for the remainder of the semester – and would be leaving the D.C. university – because she was upset that students in the class had complained about her teaching to the head of the political science department.

[…] [Greg] Berlin and a classmate, senior Elizabeth Kamens, both said that the problem with Diskin’s teaching was that she focused only on Israel in a course that was supposed to deal with the entire Arab-Israeli conflict.

“We would never cover the other side,” said Kamens, who is Jewish.

[…] Berlin said that he and a number of other students had expressed their “dissent” to Diskin in class about the way she was handling the course, but became frustrated when they would ask for an Arab perspective on an issue and Diskin would change the subject or talk over them. For example, after Diskin cited the number of Israelis who died in a particular military conflict, Berlin said, students asked for the number of fatalities on the Palestinian side. Diskin, according to Berlin, replied that only the Israeli figures were reliable, because only Israel was a democracy.

“I’m Jewish myself, but I feel there’s a line between objectivity and teaching with a bias,” said Berlin, who said he was one of a number of students who expressed their concerns to leaders of the political science department.

[…] The students said they were assigned readings from only two books: the scholarly A History of Israel by GWU professor emeritus Howard Sachar and the book Myths & Facts.

Kamens said she was “a little surprised” that the latter book was selected for an upper-level political science course because of the book’s structure. It outlines common “myths” about the Arab-Israeli conflict and then provides evidence responding to those myths.

Myths & Facts originated as a American Israel Public Affairs Committee publication decades ago and was updated by Mitchell Bard, executive director of the Chevy Chase-based American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise, in recent years.

M.J. Rosenberg, who edited Myths & Facts when he worked at AIPAC in the 1980s, was surprised to hear it was being used in a college class.

“It’s not a textbook,” said Rosenberg, now the policy director at the Israel Policy Forum. “It’s counter-propaganda” that is “not designed to show both sides,” but to provide all the facts that support the pro-Israel side.

Rosenberg said it was “hard to believe” the book would be used in any college class other than one studying propaganda.

Bard said his book is “all based on facts” and is the “most concise collection” of information on the Arab-Israeli conflict.

Coincidentally, Bard’s organization, AICE, provided the funding to hire Diskin as a postdoc fellow at GWU.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: