Posted by: Lister | April 14, 2008

Shin Bet

The Israeli security service admits using relatives to pressure jailed Palestinians:

The Shin Bet security services on Sunday admitted to arresting relatives of individuals under interrogation to extract confessions from the prisoners. The head of the Shin Bet’s interrogration department told the Knesset Constitution, Law and Justice Committee: “Certainly we used this method, but only on one occasion.

The admission was in a response to a report submitted to the committee on Sunday by the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel. The group alleged in its report that the Shin Bet makes unjustified arrests of family members, or creates the pretense of such arrests to pressure suspects.

[…] The Shin Bet official said that regarding the incident in question, the security services had not needed to use the arrest method, adding: “We said we erred, learned a lesson… I’ve said this, we’ve written this, and we’ve also fixed it.”

Shin Bet representatives added that following the incident, the body decided to stop the practice of arresting innocents to exert pressure on the suspect.

The Public Committee Against Torture in Israel made the allegations:

Attorney Aviel Linder, who compiled the report, noted that a series of international treaties prohibit psychological torture, including threatened or actual harm to family members. The report details six cases between 2007 and 2008, but says it knows of dozens of others.

According to the findings, it is a common method of interrogation to psychologically abuse a detainee using family members, and that in most cases the interrogation was not a matter of a “ticking bomb.” The report states that an interrogation using such harsh and improper means casts aspersions on the confession’s veracity.

In one case, the report states, “The Shin Bet threatened a subject named Said Diab that if he did not cooperate, his mother would be arrested. The next day he was brought to look through a peephole at his mother being aggressively questioned and crying.” In the end, the committee says, the mother was indicted on a marginal charge to justify the false arrest.

In another case, a couple, Jaser Abu-Omar and Hulah Zitawi, was arrested and held in extended detention while subjected to harsh physical torture, without letting them know the fate of their two daughters, aged two and six months.

According to Zitawi, “They said my daughters were now orphans, without a father or a mother. They showed me a picture of me with my little daughter in my arms and they said I should pity her. The picture killed me. I wept until I could no longer stand it. They said that I would not see her again until she was a teenager and she would not recognize me. That was the picture that broke me.”

In a response to the committee, dated July 2007, the attorney general’s office said: “In general, if a relative of a detainee is not in detention, and there is no legal reason to arrest the relative, the detainee should not be given the impression that the relative has been arrested.”

Nevertheless, the committee claims that the method is still being used.

The chairman of the Constitution, Law and Justice Committee, MK Menahem Ben-Sasson (Kadima), said, “It should not be forgotten that we are engaged in a war against terror. This reality does not authorize irrevocable physical harm, but it does require other actions – as needed, in a proportional and reasonable response.”

Regardless of the quality of the confession.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: